The Traditional View of Matthew As Author – Arguments in Favor – Arguments Against

User Review
5 (2 votes)

Traditional Supporting View of Matthew

  • Placed first in the range of Gospels despite the fact that it was not the first to be written.
  • Contains stories not found in any other Gospel
  • Systematic way of arrangement
    • It allows the better understanding of the content
    • Quite advanced for its time
    • 5 distinct passages
    • Introductory Section as well
    • Concluding Section as well
    • Common end for each section
  • Most sayings are from older documents
    • Making them authentic for most Christians
    • Sequence is the same as Mark
      • Gives chronological validity
    • Has supported the text with sayings of Jesus
    • Better management than Luke
      • For example the Sermon on the Mount is all at one place in Matthew but in Luke it is spread all around
  • For historical Jews
    • Matthew gives more regard to the Old Testament than MOST gospels
    • He uses Old Testament to interpret the life of jesus
    • In a way, Jews think Matthew was in support of the Christianity being a sub-sect of Judaism and not a separate sect.
    • So more acceptable to the Jews than most other Gospels
  • He even writes a few events from Jesus’s life to prove that he fulfilled the Jewish Prophecy
    • Tries to create a bridge between Jewish and Christianity
  • Matthew connects Christian ancestry to Abraham
    • That makes Christianity an inherent Abrahamaic religion
  • Matthew combines teachings and narrative in a single form
    • He narrates events as inĀ  Mark
    • Then takes pauses in between and tells Jesus’s words
    • This way, the teachings become more in line and more understandbale
  • Matthew does NOT agree with the individualistic attitude supported by Saint Paul
    • He even indirectly accuses Paul and his followers to be broken from the Kingdom of Heaven based on Jesus’s teachings.
  • Matthew was focused on ALL people, not specifically the Jews
    • It is more encompassing than most other Gospels
    • For example, different parables about common life.
  • He asks for more than formal obedience
    • He asks for the implementation of the ideas of religion in common life.
    • Formal obedience alone is not the correct motive according to him when it comes to living life according to someone’s teachings.
  • He does not polarization regarding the establishment of the Church
    • He supports both the views
      • 1. Church will be established in the future
      • 2. Already present in the hearts of people
  • It is based on temporary sources that were existent
    • Not a personal narrative
    • More authority
    • Like Logia, mark and Q source
  • Represents different point of views to avoid polarization.

Against Arguments For Matthew

  • The fact that it contains stories not found elsewhere
    • Raised questions about the authenticity of the Gospel
    • Some writers consider it to be the personal opinion of the author more than a text of historical evidence and sancticity
    • A few analysts have gone as far as to declare it a traditional work of fiction.
  • The arrangement
    • The highly systematic arrangement shows that the Gospel is a work of writing significantly than quoting reality.
    • It could very well be a work a historical dilemma one way or another.
    • The fact that it contains introductions and conclusions place it in more a formal writing contemporary than a religious text.
  • Most sayings are from TEMPORARY SOURCES
    • Some of these sources are no longer available.
      • No one has the original copy of the Logia or Q source,
      • No one knows if they REALLY existed
      • The sayings in the Gospel can be fabricated as well.
        • Jesus never said them
        • OR Jesus said different versions of the them
    • The key question here is
      • If Jesus actually said them, why didn’t the other three canonical Gospels quoted some of these sayings?
      • If they were from sources already present, they would have been quoted.
  • A rearrangement of other Gospels with fabrication
    • Most of the data in Gospel of Matthew has been taken from Mark, Luke and others and rearranged.
    • The sayings are fabricated to support the same text in a unique way.
    • It could be a thoughtful attempt to write a better version of Luke.
  • Matthew remained too neutral or too inclined to gain Jewish support
    • The views of Matthew DO NOT polarize the difference between Christianity and Judaism
    • In essence, he could have taken the optimistic approach to gain support from the majority Jews.
  • The text of Matthew focuses on sub-sect philosophy
    • The writer places Christianity as a sub-sect of Judaism and deliberately inserts stories to show the Jesus fulfilled the prophecy in Old Testament.
    • His views may have been personally biased being a Jewish Christian himself
    • No objectivity in the material: subjectivity takes over.
  • Matthew’s version places a close relation with Christian movement and Herod
    • He links the physical movement from one location to another based on Herod
      • It places Judaism as a more important and crucial determinant of Christianity
      • Takes away religious solidarity from Christianity
  • He disagrees with the notion set by Paul
    • In Christian theology, Paul’s interpretation has not been as criticized as Matthew to quote a Jesus’s reference to declare them infidel to the religion indirectly.
  • Formal obedience vs non formal obedience is a crucial determinant between Christians and different sects.
    • His ideas align with Jewish ideas of whole-hearted following
  • His views of Christian Church are vague
    • Supports both ideas.

Leave a Reply

Get more stuff like this
in your inbox

Subscribe to our mailing list and get interesting stuff and updates to your email inbox.

Thank you for subscribing.

Something went wrong.

Welcome to AYLOTI Study

error: Alert: Content is protected !!